Review Process
First and foremost, the papers would be checked for relevance to the topic of the conference. Once found relevant, the papers would go through a double- blind peer-review process.Therefore, it is essential that except the first page (where the author/ coauthors would provide their details) the identity of the author/coauthors is not disclosed anywhere in the paper. If in any way, it is found that identity is disclosed (mentioned in header/footer/background), the paper would be out rightly rejected. The papers would be evaluated on multiple parameters. The authors should specifically mention the track of their paper(s). The decision of the editorial board would be final and binding.